ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of An Economic Analysis of Recreational Fishing and Environmental Quality Changes in the Upper Oldman River BasinDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3862BJ8B

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Project Reports (Resource Economics & Environmental Sociology)

An Economic Analysis of Recreational Fishing and Environmental Quality Changes in the Upper Oldman River Basin Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Watson, David
Adamowicz, Wiktor
Boxall, Peter C.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
discrete choice travel cost
recreational fishing
Type of item
Report
Language
English
Place
Canada, Alberta, Upper Oldman River
Time
Description
A Discrete Choice Travel Cost model, based on data collected from a survey of recreational anglers, was used to estimate changes in recreational fishing benefits in the Upper Oldman River region of Alberta resulting from the construction of a dam. The results show that this model is useful for measuring the impact of public works projects on non-market economic benefits. Predictions of the distribution of trips to each fishing site before and after placement of the dam are also identified by the model. The model is sensitive to the variables chosen and the measurement of quality attributes. The quality attributes which affect the choice of site include the potential to catch fish (catch rate and size of fish), access, and the size of the water body. Including the value of travel time in the travel costs causes an increase in the welfare estimates, but does not affect the variables used. Construction of the dam and creation of the reservoir reduces recreational fishing benefits of the area. The welfare impacts of the decline of recreational fishing quality range from an annual loss of $96,239.10 to a loss of $30,545.20 depending on the model specification, and whether the value of time is included. The government efforts at mitigating the dam's effect by construction of fish habitat in remaining reaches may improve the welfare of users to levels equal to or greater than the original benefits. The mitigation effort, assuming a success rate that is considered most probable, results in an annual gain in welfare of from $209,499.80 to $22,971.60 depending on the model specification, and whether the value of time is included.
Date created
1993
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3862BJ8B
License information
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-30T22:49:46.883+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1615007
Last modified: 2015:10:12 21:18:51-06:00
Filename: PR 93-01.pdf
Original checksum: 9487c7fd3ac04804da420df7801adfe5
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Malformed filter offset=1257638
Page count: 78
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date