ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Returns to Farmland Investment in Alberta, 1964-1989Download the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3CV4BZ8Z

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Project Reports (Resource Economics & Environmental Sociology)

Returns to Farmland Investment in Alberta, 1964-1989 Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Phillips, William E.
Bauer, Leonard
Akabua, Kojo M.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
risk management
agricultural investments
farmland
Type of item
Report
Language
English
Place
Canada, Alberta
Time
1964/1989
Description
The objective of this study was to analyze the performance of Alberta farmland relative to investment opportunities from financial securities. It is an extension of an earlier study undertaken by Mercier (1988) and Philllips et al. (1989). This study re-examines the period from 1964 to 1985, and extends the data series to 1989. The results show that Alberta farmland out performed the stock market in both nominal and real terms. Beta values, which measure the degree of association, were estimated at -0/1632 to -0.1351 for nominal and real terms respectively. Neither nominal nor real beta values were significantly different from zero at the 5% probability level. These results are not inconsistent with earlier studies, and are attributed to the fact that returns in agriculture are subject to a different set of economic and environmental influences than are present for the stock market generally. This suggests possibilities for risk reduction by including stock market investments in conjunction with farmland ownership. Whereas no correlation was found between farmland and the stock market, returns in excess of what can be explained by compensation for risk were detected. The estimated alpha values of 11.27% and 10.21% for the nominal and real situations were significantly different from zero at the 5% level of probability. These values may be due, partially, to the fact that real estate taxes were not deducted in computing the results. Furthermore, the costs of administration in farmland investments, because of the much less formal market environment in which they are held, may be considerably greater than for the stock market. In addition, stock market investments are considerably more divisible and liquid than is the farmland counterpart. Factors such as these bear further study.
Date created
1993
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3CV4BZ8Z
License information
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-05-01T00:08:56.204+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 653257
Last modified: 2015:10:12 17:57:50-06:00
Filename: PR 93-08.pdf
Original checksum: 7e9cf7a250a2c9f9f5b76cd222da28c7
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Malformed filter offset=296625
Page count: 46
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date