ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Evaluation of the living with hope program for rural women caregivers of persons with advanced cancer.Download the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3CJ87P34

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Nursing, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Chronicity

Evaluation of the living with hope program for rural women caregivers of persons with advanced cancer. Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Duggleby, W.
Williams, A.
Holstlander, L.
Cooper, D.
Ghosh, S.
Hallstrom, L.
McLean, R. T.
Hampton, M.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
hope
intervention
palliative care
caregivers
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Background Hope has been identified as a key psychosocial resource among family caregivers to manage and deal with the caregiver experience. The Living with Hope Program is a self-administered intervention that consists of watching an international award winning Living with Hope film and participating in a two week hope activity (“Stories of the Present”). The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the Living with Hope Program on self-efficacy [General Self-Efficacy Scale], loss and grief [Non-Death Revised Grief Experience Inventory], hope [Herth Hope Index] and quality of life [Short-Form 12 version 2 (SF-12v2)] in rural women caring for persons with advanced cancer and to model potential mechanisms through which changes occurred. Methods A time-series embedded mixed method design was used, with quantitative baseline outcome measures repeated at day 7, day 14, and 3, 6 and 12 months. Qualitative data from the hope activity informed the quantitative data. Thirty-six participants agreed to participate with 22 completing all data collection. General estimating equations were used to analyze the data. Results Herth Hope Index scores (p=0.05) had increased significantly from baseline at day 7. General Self Efficacy Scale scores were significantly higher than baseline at all data time points. To determine the mechanisms of the Living with Hope Program through which changes occurred, results of the data analysis suggested that as General Self Efficacy Scale scores increased (p<0.001) and Non-death Revised Grief Experience Inventory scores decreased (p=0.01) Herth Hope Index scores increased. In addition as Herth Hope Index scores increased (p<0.001) and Non-death Revised Grief Experience Inventory scores decreased (p=0.01), SF-12v2 mental health summary scores increased. Qualitative data suggested that through the hope activity (Stories of the Present) the participants were able to find positives and hope in their experience. Conclusions The Living with Hope Program has potential to increase hope and improve quality of life for rural women caregivers of persons with advanced cancer. The possible mechanisms by which changes in hope and quality of life occur are by decreasing loss and grief and increasing self-efficacy.
Date created
2013
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3CJ87P34
License information
This is an open access article distributed...
Rights
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation for previous publication
Duggleby, W., Williams, A., Holstlander, L., Cooper, D., Ghosh, S., Hallstrom, L., McLean, R. T., & Hampton, M. (2013). Evaluation of the living with hope program for rural women caregivers of persons with advanced cancer. BMC Palliative Care, 12(1).
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-05-02T17:10:29.015+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 684013
Last modified: 2015:10:12 14:36:15-06:00
Filename: BMC_PC_2013_12_36.pdf
Original checksum: 1500074d9d5e8c2a671a080a3c0ae9d8
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid Resources Entry in document offset=4784
Status message: Invalid Resources Entry in document offset=4784
Status message: Invalid Annotation property offset=4784
Status message: Invalid outline dictionary item offset=659928
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date