ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Children in reviews: methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses.Download the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R37W6784P

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Pediatrics, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE)

Children in reviews: methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses. Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Cramer, K.
Wiebe, N.
Moyer, V.
Hartling, L.
Williams, K.
Swingler, G.
Klassen, T. P.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
pediatrics
drug therapy
biomedical research
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Background The delivery of optimal medical care to children is dependent on the availability of child relevant research. Our objectives were to: i) systematically review and describe how children are handled in reviews of drug interventions published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR); and ii) determine when effect sizes for the same drug interventions differ between children and adults. Methods We systematically identified all of the reviews relevant to child health in the CDSR 2002, Issue 4. Reviews were included if they investigated the efficacy or effectiveness of a drug intervention for a condition that occurs in both children and adults. Information was extracted on review characteristics including study methods, results, and conclusions. Results From 1496 systematic reviews, 408 (27%) were identified as relevant to both adult and child health; 52% (213) of these included data from children. No significant differences were found in effect sizes between adults and children for any of the drug interventions or conditions investigated. However, all of the comparisons lacked the power to detect a clinically significant difference and wide confidence intervals suggest important differences cannot be excluded. A large amount of data was unavailable due to inadequate reporting at the trial and systematic review level. Conclusion Overall, the findings of this study indicate there is a paucity of child-relevant and specific evidence generated from evidence syntheses of drug interventions. The results indicate a need for a higher standard of reporting for participant populations in studies of drug interventions.
Date created
2005
DOI
doi:10.7939/R37W6784P
License information
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication
Cramer, K., Wiebe, N., Moyer, V., Hartling, L., Williams, K., Swingler, G., & Klassen, T. P. (2005). Children in reviews: methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses. BMC Pediatrics, 5, 38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-5-38.
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-08-07T19:57:45.343+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 266548
Last modified: 2015:10:12 14:31:50-06:00
Filename: BMC_P_2005_5_38.pdf
Original checksum: e468e1faed217a7e589d3557421f8ba6
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid Resources Entry in document offset=5128
Status message: Invalid Resources Entry in document offset=5128
Status message: Invalid object number or object stream offset=5128
Status message: Invalid outline dictionary item offset=136535
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date