ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Social Impact Assessment of the Proposed Dodds-RoundHill Coal Gasification ProjectDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3VM42W8P

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Project Reports (Resource Economics & Environmental Sociology)

Social Impact Assessment of the Proposed Dodds-RoundHill Coal Gasification Project Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Parkins, John R.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
comparative case study
social indicators
environmental impact assessment
energy policy
social research methods
Type of item
Report
Language
English
Place
Canada, Alberta
Time
2009
Description
This project report was completed by 14 graduate and undergraduate students in a social impact assessment course (AREC 450-550) during the Winter Term, January to April, 2009. The overall goal of this project was to learn specific concepts and methods for social impact assessment by undertaking such an assessment for the proposed Dodds-Roundhill Coal Gasification project (Southeast of Edmonton, Alberta). The social impact assessment is composed of four major components: (1) scoping of relevant social indicators, (2) social impacts within municipalities, (3) social impacts within the farming region, and (4) a comparative case study of social impacts. Together, the four project reports provide insights into the potential social impacts from the proposed coal gasification projects in the Dodd-Roundhill region. In each project, students identified opportunities and challenges in conducting research. These insights may be useful in the development of monitoring frameworks and long-term evaluation processes with regard to this project. Also, each project utilized a variety of methods for social impact assessment and the learning from these methods may be useful for assessment practitioners as they work with communities to identify social impacts in other locales.
Date created
2009
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3VM42W8P
License information
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-29T21:15:37.712+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 2235852
Last modified: 2015:10:12 11:32:43-06:00
Filename: PR-09-02.pdf
Original checksum: 7e089aec2d11b250fe2ae5696c92ee8f
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid page tree node offset=1751953
Status message: Unexpected error in findFonts java.lang.ClassCastException: edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfSimpleObject cannot be cast to edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfDictionary offset=3862
Status message: Invalid Annotation list offset=2161214
Status message: Outlines contain recursive references.
File title: PART IV: COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY 75
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date