ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of An Economic Analysis of Alternative Cropping Decisions Under UncertaintyDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3CJ87Q3K

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Project Reports (Resource Economics & Environmental Sociology)

An Economic Analysis of Alternative Cropping Decisions Under Uncertainty Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Bauer, Leonard
Novak, Frank
Armstrong, Glen W.
Staples, Blaine
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
risk management
crop management
farm management
Type of item
Report
Language
English
Place
Canada, Alberta
Time
Description
This project has examined after tax gross margin net present values accruing to Alberta wheat farmers under three fertilizer and crop rotation systems; a fixed rotation traditional fertilizer system, a static economic fertilizer decision system within a fixed rotation, and a static economic fertilizer decision system within a dynamic flex-cropping framework. Decision rules appropriate to each system were developed for case farms in three Alberta agro-climatic regions; Medicine Hat, Lethbridge and Olds. The flex-cropping issue is expressed in a dynamic programming framework and incorporates elements not fully explored in previous studies; income taxation, variable input level decisions and stochastically determined moisture conditions and crop prices. Decisions are compared by simulating net present values of after tax gross margins for each system. The traditional system generated the lowest net present value, approximately 5 to 17 per cent below the static economic system. Greater improvements, on the order of 14 to 31 per cent above the static economic system, were observed by following dynamic flex-cropping decision rules. Not only did the dynamic flex-cropping decision rules generate superior decision rules regarding mean net present values, the rules were also risk efficient. The probability of low gross margins was minimized in all cases by following the dynamic flex-cropping decision rules. The results of this and related studies indicate that dynamic flex-cropping models are viable for solving crop scheduling problems. The prescriptive power of the model is limited by available data, limitations which reside primarily in the agronomic components. The relationship between spring soil moisture, soil nutrients, and yield must be more clearly defined. This may be accomplished through extensive and long term field trials or through use of emerging biophysical models. Standardization of soil moisture classifications, including method of sampling and depth of measurement, would make field data more adaptable for making fertilizer and recropping decisions. The production functions defining the relationship between spring soil moisture levels and yields are particularly important. These require continued empirical attention. The model developed lends itself readily to extensions such as additional crops, fertilizer inputs, erosion costs and soil degradation issues, financial structure of the farm, and evaluating the influence of government programs. Modern computers with large computational and storage capabilities make the implementation of stochastic dynamic programming methodology a viable farm management tool.
Date created
1992
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3CJ87Q3K
License information
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-05-01T00:46:33.299+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 675395
Last modified: 2015:10:12 20:29:58-06:00
Filename: PR 92-07.pdf
Original checksum: 554a78c8982b2c4090c16512f57649ea
Well formed: true
Valid: true
Page count: 39
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date