ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Political Liberal or Comprehensive Capabilities?  A Critique of Nussbaum's Capabilities ApproachDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3ZM3W

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Political Liberal or Comprehensive Capabilities? A Critique of Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Political Liberalism
Martha Nussbaum
Capabilities Approach
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Johnson, Christopher Morgan
Supervisor and department
Nye, Howard (Philosophy)
Welchman, Jennifer (Philosophy)
Examining committee member and department
Carmichael, Don (Political Science)
Hurka, Thomas (Philosophy)
Schmitter, Amy (Philosophy)
Department
Department of Philosophy
Specialization

Date accepted
2014-01-27T08:55:44Z
Graduation date
2014-06
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Doctoral
Abstract
This project examines the capabilities approach as developed by Martha Nussbaum. Its question is whether Nussbaum’s theory is best conceived as a version of political liberalism as she contends, or rather as a form of comprehensive liberalism that is culturally sensitive and pragmatically restrained. Nussbaum’s capabilities approach is a partial theory of justice that holds that citizens’ equality should be measured in terms of capabilities, or opportunity-freedoms to be and to do. Its proposal is that citizens are equal in terms of their dignity, and that the dignity of each citizen is secured by ensuring they have the basic capabilities that make for a dignified life. In response to concerns that any such list of capabilities is paternalistic, Nussbaum argues that her list of basic capabilities is free of metaphysical grounding and conceived for political purposes only. It is thus her contention that her capabilities can be the subject of an overlapping consensus by reasonable people, and that her political conception abides by the basic principle of political liberal legitimacy that citizens should be able to endorse the principles that govern them. Given Nussbaum’s notion of reasonableness, however, there are reasons to object that her political conception is unjustifiably coercive on political liberal standards. Her responses to these criticisms – that they can be accommodated by means of her distinction between capabilities and functionings, and that support for her capabilities can be found in critics’ standing beliefs and values – are shown to be unsatisfactory. These failures entail that Nussbaum is unable to defend her capabilities approach as a version of political liberalism. Given Nussbaum’s reformist agenda, however, and her need to secure capabilities as the condition of a dignified life, I argue she should defend her theory as a form of comprehensive liberalism that is culturally sensitive and pragmatically restrained. On comprehensive liberal standards of respect and legitimacy, Nussbaum’s political conception would not be justified by anticipated endorsement of her capabilities, but by the value of the capabilities themselves and because moral principle requires it.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3ZM3W
Rights
Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-06-15T07:01:12.915+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1145856
Last modified: 2015:10:12 13:14:53-06:00
Filename: Johnson - Political Liberal or Comprehensive Capabilities - A Critique of Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach (Submission).pdf
Original checksum: ca5e005d1e4f81b3acf36094472bd037
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid page tree node offset=134376
Status message: Unexpected error in findFonts java.lang.ClassCastException: edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfSimpleObject cannot be cast to edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfDictionary offset=3152
Status message: Invalid Annotation list offset=1054929
Status message: Outlines contain recursive references.
File title: 20140110Thesis_cover Submission.pdf
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date