Download the full-sized PDF
Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R30P0WT3Q
This file is in the following communities:
|Law, Faculty of|
This file is in the following collections:
|Journal Articles (Law)|
Good Faith in Contractual Performance: The Supreme Court’s Confusing Lesson in Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd Open Access
- Author or creator
- Additional contributors
- Type of item
- Journal Article (Published)
In Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd. l the Supreme Court of Canada was asked to remedy the alleged bad faith by an employer, both for the fact of dismissing the plaintiffand for its manner ofeffecting thedismissal . This marks the first time that Canada's highest court has had to decide whether an indeterminate employment contract contains an implied term not to dismiss an employee, absent a good faith reason to do so, as well as whether a harsh manner ofdismissal falling short ofthe standard articulated in Vorvis v .Insurance Corp. ofBritish Colunzbia,2 can nonetheless found a cause of action in contract or in tort .
- Date created
- License information
- © 1998 Shannon O'Byrne. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
- Citation for previous publication
O'Byrne, S., (1998). Good Faith in Contractual Performance: The Supreme Court’s Confusing Lesson in Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd. Canadian Bar Review, 77(), 492-508.
- Link to related item
- Date Uploaded
- Date Modified
- Audit Status
- Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 8140503
Last modified: 2016:11:09 14:55:07-07:00
Original checksum: fa3fd9b451f490e3a6618f692e592221
Well formed: true
File title: Droit à l'image : La vie privée devient veto privé : Aacbiy c. Éditions Vice-Versa Inc.  I.R.C.S . 591 .
Page count: 111