ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Studies in recolonization of stream substrates by aquatic organismsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3R49GB74

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Oil Sands Research and Information Network (OSRIN)

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

AOSERP Reports

Studies in recolonization of stream substrates by aquatic organisms Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Lock, M. A.
Wallace, R. R.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
Invertebrates
AOSERP WS 4.1
Tarsands
Oil Sands
Oilsands
Tar Sands
Algae
Alberta
AOSERP
Type of item
Report
Language
English
Place
Canada, Alberta, Fort McMurray
Time
Description
The colonization of limestone gravel, limestone gravel + organic matter, and limestone gravel from a river bed was followed over time in order to compare two possible stream reclamation substrates with a control (river gravel). After nine weeks of colonization by benthic micro- and macro-organisms there were few significant differences between the river gravel control and limestone gravel and limestone gravel + organic matter, the two gravels under test. Specific differences were noted in algal composition of the epilithon, with the numbers of Cyanophyta and Chlorophyta being 50% below those on river gravel while the numbers of Bacillariophyta were considerably higher (300 to 1000%), yet the chlorophyll a concentration was approximately the same on all three gravels at 0.4 µg•cm-2. However, the similar numbers and biomass of micro-invertebrates on the three gravels suggested that the amount of energy available for higher trophic levels was equivalent. A major difference between the river gravel and the two test gravels was in the very much larger macro-invertebrate population found in the latter. It was concluded that, although limestone rubble would be a suitable substrate for river reclamation, the time for recolonization would be considerably longer than indicated in the study because of the very high levels of propagules available from the river in which the experiments were carried out.
Date created
1979
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3R49GB74
License information
Rights
This material is provided under educational reproduction permissions included in Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development's Copyright and Disclosure Statement, see terms at http://www.environment.alberta.ca/copyright.html. This Statement requires the following identification: \"The source of the materials is Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development http://www.environment.gov.ab.ca/. The use of these materials by the end user is done without any affiliation with or endorsement by the Government of Alberta. Reliance upon the end user's use of these materials is at the risk of the end user.
Citation for previous publication

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-24T23:12:40.192+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/X)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1115835
Last modified: 2015:10:12 14:30:30-06:00
Filename: WS 4.1 - 1979 - Lock.pdf
Original checksum: cc45bd4576269eb423c8dd382dfdaa33
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date