ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Therapy Process Research: A Content Analysis of Four Leading JournalsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3M32NN9Z

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Therapy Process Research: A Content Analysis of Four Leading Journals Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
content analysis
therapy
process research
alliance
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Allan, Angela M
Supervisor and department
Hanson, William (Counselling Psychology)
Examining committee member and department
Whelton, William (Counselling Psyology)
Hanson, William (Counselling Psychology)
Wallace, Kevin (Counselling Psychology)
Department
Department of Educational Psychology
Specialization
Counselling Psychology
Date accepted
2017-04-03T11:09:26Z
Graduation date
2017-06:Spring 2017
Degree
Master of Education
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
In 1994, Hill, Nutt, and Jackson conducted a systematic, 15-year review of the Journal of Counseling Psychology (JCP) and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (JCCP). Their review focused on study characteristics of published process research. They defined process as the “within-session interaction in face-to-face treatment with therapists and clients” (p. 365) and concluded that, generally speaking JCP published proportionately more process-oriented research than JCCP. Further, that research was most likely to involve brief, individual therapy, and the evaluation was most likely to involve pre-existing measures focused primarily on evaluating therapists and their techniques and facilitative conditions using pre-existing measures. In an effort to update an extend Hill et al.’s findings, the present review sampled articles from four leading therapy journals: JCP, JCCP, Psychotherapy, and Psychotherapy Research (PR). In total, 1,375 articles between 2000-2016 were studied. Just over fourteen percent (14.55%) of these randomly sampled studies (n = 200) were process-oriented. PR published the greatest proportion of therapy process research (13.92%) as well as process-outcome research (15.75%). In five-year time blocks, process studies increased from 2.96% to 8.45%; and process-outcome studies increased from 5.66% to 11.27%. The profile of a typical study in the last 15 years appears to involve process and outcome of individual therapy in a real setting, between an experienced therapist and an adult client who as been asked/recruited to participate. Further, the prototypical study likely involves asking clients to complete a single, previously-used process measure of their impression of the working alliance, which will be report reliability estimates for "data in hand.”
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3M32NN9Z
Rights
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2017-04-03T17:09:26.810+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1935147
Last modified: 2017:06:13 12:23:13-06:00
Filename: Allan_Angela_M_201703_MEd.pdf
Original checksum: 7780dece0983edbaa9af986ae9914ed7
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date