ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Assessment of the regulatory response to complaints related to unconventional oil and gas operationsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R33776353

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Assessment of the regulatory response to complaints related to unconventional oil and gas operations Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Unconventional
Oil and Gas
Complaint Investigations
Environmental Public Health
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Ponto, Jessica A
Supervisor and department
Guigard, Selma (Civil and Environmental Engineering)
Kindzierski, Warren (School of Public Health)
Examining committee member and department
Buchanan, Ian (Civil and Environmental Engineering)
Guigard, Selma (Civil and Environmental Engineering)
Kindzierski, Warren (School of Public Health)
Department
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Specialization
Environmental Science
Date accepted
2016-09-30T13:58:09Z
Graduation date
2016-06:Fall 2016
Degree
Master of Science
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
Unconventional oil and gas development in Alberta has been rapidly expanding over the past couple of decades and has raised public concerns regarding the potential public health impacts and environmental contamination. The objectives of this thesis were to identify the types of unconventional oil and gas issues that government agencies, like health and environment departments, respond to, and to determine the complaint investigation approaches that have worked best for experienced jurisdictions to respond appropriately to the identified concerns. To fulfill the objectives, seven agencies from four US States were selected to be surveyed based on the presence of unconventional oil and gas plays in their State, the extent of resource development and their role in investigating complaints. These States were Colorado, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The types of agencies that responded to the survey were state health departments, state environment departments, and state oil and gas regulators. The survey results suggest that there is variation with the types and nature of public concerns investigated by each State agency. However, air quality complaints were likely to be one of the most abundant concerns and also the most challenging to mitigate due to intermittent emissions and nonspecific exposures. Survey participants also cited water concerns and general health complaints as being issues that their state agencies respond to on a frequent basis. The approach taken by the agencies to act upon the concerns mentioned above was similar; all agencies investigated all complaints, including non-specific issues, with priority given to health and odour concerns. Inter-agency collaboration was critical to ensure a multiple lines of evidence approach and was best achieved by clarifying roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders in the context of the different types of anticipated complaints. Other complaint investigation strategies included centralized intake and coordination of complaints, the ability of agencies to respond quickly to concerns with suitable equipment and tools, appropriate training and expertise of regulatory and advisory agency personnel, health-based regulations, and a comprehensive reporting system.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R33776353
Rights
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2016-09-30T19:58:10.394+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 2707567
Last modified: 2016:11:16 13:38:54-07:00
Filename: Ponto_Jessica_A_201609_MSc.pdf
Original checksum: 533a9fd8557cd815b01ca5ed16639e59
Well formed: true
Valid: true
Status message: Too many fonts to report; some fonts omitted. Total fonts = 1268
File title: CHAPTER 1   INTRODUCTION
File title: Jessica Anne Ponto
File author: Jessica Popadynetz
Page count: 198
File language: EN-US
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date