Download the full-sized PDF of ...Whereas I am Trying to Think Theologically:  Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Hidden Dialogue with Carl Schmitt on Representation:  A Theological Response to A Jurisprudential Challenge during a Political CrisisDownload the full-sized PDF



Permanent link (DOI):


Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley


This file is in the following communities:

St. Stephen's College


This file is in the following collections:

Department of Theology-MTS (St. Stephen's College)

...Whereas I am Trying to Think Theologically: Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Hidden Dialogue with Carl Schmitt on Representation: A Theological Response to A Jurisprudential Challenge during a Political Crisis Open Access


Other title
political theology
numerical growth in church congregations
Type of item
Degree grantor
St. Stephen's College
Author or creator
Karola Susanne Radler
Supervisor and department
Rev. Dr. Dittmar MÜndel
Examining committee member and department
Dr. Bill Close
Dr. Earle Sharam
Date accepted
Graduation date
Master of Theological Studies (Honours)
Degree level
Dietrich Bonhoeffer responded with his theological interpretation known as discipleship in responsible, mature representation of Christ (Stellvertretung) in a hidden dialogue to Carl Schmitt’s jurisprudential, ideological “political theology” of mythical totalitarian leadership (Repräsentanz), developed during the early 20th century in Germany. In an interdisciplinary investigation of mainly primary literature sources is laid open a hitherto overlooked perspective on Bonhoeffer’s theology and the relevance of Bonhoeffer’s and Schmitt’s intellectual encounter for the world of the 21st century. Bonhoeffer, due to his close access to professor of constitutional law Gerhard Leibholz, his brother-in-law, was aware of jurisprudential thought as well as of Schmitt’s theories and pointedly used juristic concepts within his theology. He confronted Schmitt’s system of ‘Identity of Oneness’ with a ‘Triangular Relationship’ which incorporated aspects of Leibholz’s opposition to Schmitt. The structural elements of Domain, Unity, Sovereign, and Grounding revealed that legal individual rights granted by a worldly authority can be manipulated and repealed by using mythical identities but that the personal freedom to responsible decisions and actions given by the ‘original’ authority is irrevocable. Contemporary situations showed that their intellectual dialogue on representation transcends the context of its origin. Bonhoeffer’s theological response of Stellvertretung to Schmitt’s jurisprudential challenge of Repräsentanz receives renewed vigour whenever and wherever a human-made organizational framework of ‘life together’ is in a socio-economically and politically unstable situation of transition in which the balance between jurisprudential and theological interpretations is renegotiated.
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for non-commercial purposes. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 630867
Last modified: 2018:01:22 16:58:01-07:00
Filename: Radler_Karola_2011_MTSHon.pdf
Original checksum: 2cb70506f7248656a5220bfd6a96ea4e
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid page tree node offset=254429
Status message: Unexpected error in findFonts java.lang.ClassCastException: edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfSimpleObject cannot be cast to edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfDictionary offset=563921
Status message: Invalid Annotation list offset=559729
Status message: Outlines contain recursive references.
File title: BIBLIOGRAPHY 144
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date