ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Comparison of Objective External Carcass Measurements and Subjective Conformation Scores for Prediction of Lamb Carcass QualityDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3DR4P

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Roy Berg Kinsella Research Ranch

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Journal Articles (Kinsella Ranch)

Comparison of Objective External Carcass Measurements and Subjective Conformation Scores for Prediction of Lamb Carcass Quality Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Stanford, K.
Woloschuk, C. M.
McClelland, L. A.
S. D. M. Jones.
Price, M. A.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
meat yield
carcass
lamb
measurement
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Carcass measurements were collected from 1505 lambs over a 2-yr period by a single technician. The lambs (rams, ewes and wethers) were classified as either meat-type or wool-type, with meat-type subdivided by frame size into light, medium or large. Carcass measurements included carcass length (L), length of hind leg (T), depth of hind leg (H) and circumference of hind leg (G). Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada graders measured tissue depth of all lambs at the GR site (11 cm from carcass midline over the 12th rib) and assigned subjective conformation scores for the regions of the leg, loin and shoulder. Sixty-nine lambs across groups were dissected into primal cuts to determine saleable meat yield. Carcass length and T decreased (P < 0.05) with increasing conformation score, whereas G and H increased (P < 0.05) with increasing conformation score. Wool-breed and light-frame lambs had lower conformation scores (P < 0.01) for the regions of the leg and loin than did medium- and large-frame lambs. Comparing the results of carcass dissection, wool-breed lambs had a lower saleable meat yield (P < 0.05) than large-frame lambs. Saleable meat yield also tended to be lower for light-frame than for medium- and large-frame lambs, although the numbers of medium- and light-frame lambs dissected were low. The carcass measurements used in this study accurately predicted percentage of the high priced leg cuts (R2 = 0.80, RSD = 0.6%), and were marginally more accurate than subjective conformation scores in predicting saleable yield from dissection (R2 = 0.61, RSD = 1.3%). However the carcass measurements used in this study were not valuable predictors of percentages of shoulder or loin and rack in the primal cuts. These data do not indicate any unjustified bias in the subjective conformation scores currently in use in the Canadian Classification System for lamb, as the breed types and frame sizes assigned lower conformation scores also had lower saleable meat yields.
Date created
1997
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3DR4P
License information
Rights
@1997 Stanford, K., Woloschuk, C. M., McClelland, L. A., S. D. M. Jones., Price, M. A. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
Citation for previous publication
Stanford, K., C.M. Woloschuk, L.A. McClelland, S.D.M. Jones and Price, M.A. (1997). Comparison of Objective External Carcass Measurements and Subjective Conformation Scores for Prediction of Lamb Carcass Quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 77, 217 – 223.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/A96-015

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 32097
Last modified: 2016:06:24 18:55:14-06:00
Filename: cjas_77_217-223
Original checksum: b981964a04794bcaa94b1b00766e1297
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid page dictionary object offset=31616
File title: Comparison of objective external carcass measurements and subjective conformation scores for prediction of lamb carcass quality
File author: K. Stanford, C. M. Woloschuk, L. A. McClelland, S. D. M. Jones, M. A. Price
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date