ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Greenhouse gas emissions from calf- and yearling-fed beef production systems, with and without the use of growth promotantsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R33B5W96T

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Roy Berg Kinsella Research Ranch

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Journal Articles (Kinsella Ranch)

Greenhouse gas emissions from calf- and yearling-fed beef production systems, with and without the use of growth promotants Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Basarab, J. A.
Baron, V. S
López-Campos, Ó.
Aalhus, J. L.
Haugen-Kozyra, K.
Okine, E. K.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
production efficiency
carbon footprint
life cycle assessment
hormone implant
beef
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
A spring calving herd consisting of about 350 beef cows, 14–16 breeding bulls, 60 replacement heifers and 112 steers were used to compare the whole-farm GHG emissions among calf-fed vs. yearling-fed production systems with and without growth implants. Carbon footprint ranged from 11.63 to 13.22 kg CO2e per kg live weight (19.87–22.52 kg CO2e per kg carcass weight). Enteric CH4 was the largest source of GHG emissions (53–54%), followed by manure N2O (20–22%), cropping N2O (11%), energy use CO2 (9–9.5%), and manure CH4 (4–6%). Beef cow accounted for 77% and 58% of the GHG emissions in the calf-fed and yearling-fed. Feeders accounted for the second highest GHG emissions (15% calf-fed; 35–36% yearling-fed). Implants reduced the carbon footprint by 4.9–5.1% compared with hormone-free. Calf-fed reduced the carbon footprint by 6.3–7.5% compared with yearling-fed. When expressed as kg CO2e per kg carcass weight per year the carbon footprint of calf-fed production was 73.9–76.1% lower than yearling-fed production, and calf-fed implanted was 85% lower than hormone-free yearling-fed. Reducing GHG emissions from beef production may be accomplished by improving the feed efficiency of the cow herd, decreasing the days on low quality feeds, and reducing the age at harvest of youthful cattle.
Date created
2012
DOI
doi:10.7939/R33B5W96T
License information
Attribution 4.0 International
Rights

Citation for previous publication
Basarab, J.A., V.S Baron, Ó López-Campos, J.L. Aalhus, K. Haugen-Kozyra and E.K. Okine. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions from calf- and yearling-fed beef production systems, with and without the use of growth promotants. Animals 2(2), 195-220.  http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani2020195

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 186582
Last modified: 2016:06:24 18:08:09-06:00
Filename: animals-02-00195
Original checksum: 046798bd26790a434c689c5ddf1b2b16
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid object number in cross-reference stream offset=186548
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date