Download the full-sized PDF of Improving beef hamburger quality and fatty acid profiles through dietary manipulation and exploitation of fat depot heterogeneityDownload the full-sized PDF



Permanent link (DOI):


Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley


This file is in the following communities:

Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Department of


This file is in the following collections:

Journal Articles (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)

Improving beef hamburger quality and fatty acid profiles through dietary manipulation and exploitation of fat depot heterogeneity Open Access


Author or creator
Mapiye, Cletos
Aalhus, Jennifer L.
Vahmani, Payam
Rolland, David C.
McAllister, Timothy A.
Block, Hushton C.
Uttaro, Bethany
Proctor, Spencer D.
Dugan, Michael E. R.
Additional contributors
Oxidative Stability
Fat Depot
Fatty Acids
Sensory Attributes
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Background Hamburger is the most consumed beef product in North America, but lacks in nutritional appeal due to its high fat content and high proportion of saturated fatty acids (SFA). Objectives of the present study were to improve the FA profiles of hamburgers made with perirenal fat (PRF) and subcutaneous fat (SCF) when feeding steers different diets along with examining differences in sensory attributes and oxidative stability. Diets included a control diet containing 70:30 red clover silage: barley based concentrate, a diet containing sunflower-seed (SS) substituted for barley, and diets containing SS with 15% wheat dried distillers’ grain with solubles (DDGS-15) or 30% DDGS (DDGS-30). Hamburgers were made from triceps brachii and either PRF or SCF (80:20 w/w). Results Perirenal fat versus SCF hamburgers FA had 14.3% more (P <0.05) 18:0, 11.8% less cis (c) 9-18:1 (P <0.05), and 1.82% more total trans (t)-18:1 mainly in the form of t 11-18:1. During sensory evaluation, PRF versus SCF hamburgers had greater (P <0.05) mouth coating, but the difference was less than one panel unit. Examining effects of steer diet within PRF hamburgers, feeding the SS compared to the control diet increased (P <0.05) t-18:1 by 2.89% mainly in the form of t 11-18:1, feeding DGGS-15 diet led to no further changes (P >0.05), but feeding DDGS-30 diet reduced the proportions of (P <0.05) of t-18:1 chiefly t 11-18:1. Feeding SS and DDGS diets had small but significant (P <0.05) effects on hamburger sensory attributes and oxidative stability. Conclusions Feeding high-forage diets including SS and 15% DDGS, and taking advantage of the FA heterogeneity between fat depots offers an opportunity to differentially enhance beef hamburgers with 18:2n-6 biohydrogenation products (i.e., t 11-18:1) with potential human health benefits without compromising their sensory attributes and oxidative stability during retail display.
Date created
License information

Attribution 4.0 International
Citation for previous publication
Mapiye, C., Aalhus, J. L., Vahmani, P., Rolland, D. C., McAllister, T. A., Block, H. C., Uttaro, B., Proctor, S. D. & Dugan, M. E. R. (2014). Improving beef hamburger quality and fatty acid profiles through dietary manipulation and exploitation of fat depot heterogeneity. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 5(54), [11 pages].


Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 373626
Last modified: 2017:09:06 16:11:17-06:00
Filename: BMCJASB_5_54.pdf
Original checksum: 2db7b5c63b94d44e15e72d7c21c457fc
Copyright note: � 2014 Mapiye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date