ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Use of routine interventions in vaginal labour and birth: Findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey.Download the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3KS6J703

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Nursing, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Health Systems

Use of routine interventions in vaginal labour and birth: Findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey. Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Chalmers, B.
Kaczorowski, J.
Levitt, C.
Dzakpasu, S.
O'Brien, B.
Lee, L.
Boscoe, M.
Young, D.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
maternity experiences
birth
labor
interventions
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Background: Intervention rates in maternity practices vary considerably across Canadian provinces and territories. The objective of this study was to describe the use of routine interventions and practices in labor and birth as reported by women in the Maternity Experiences Survey of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Rates of interventions and practices are considered in the light of current evidence and both Canadian and international recommendations. Methods: A sample of 8,244 estimated eligible women was identified from a randomly selected sample of recently born infants drawn from the May 2006 Canadian Census and stratified primarily by province and territory. Birth mothers living with their infants at the time of interview were invited to participate in a computer-assisted telephone interview conducted by Statistics Canada on behalf of the Public Health Agency of Canada. Interviews averaged 45 minutes long and were completed when infants were between 5 and 10 months old (9–14 mo in the territories). Completed responses were obtained from 6,421 women (78%). Results: Women frequently reported electronic fetal monitoring, a health care practitioner starting or speeding up their labor (or trying to do so), epidural anesthesia, episiotomy, and a supine position for birth. Some women also reported pubic or perineal shaves, enemas, and pushing on the top of their abdomen. Conclusions: Several practices and interventions were commonly reported in labor and birth in Canada, although evidence and Canadian and international guidelines recommend against their routine use. Practices not recommended for use at all, such as shaving, were also reported.
Date created

DOI
doi:10.7939/R3KS6J703
License information
Rights
© 2009 Wiley Blackwell. This version...
Citation for previous publication
Chalmers, B, Kaczorowski J, Levitt C, Dzakpasu S, O'Brien B, Lee Lily, Boscoe M, Young D. Use of routine interventions in vaginal labour and birth: Findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey. BIRTH: Issues in prenatal care 36.1 (2009), 13:25.
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-29T21:31:14.222+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 115680
Last modified: 2016:10:29 01:09:48-06:00
Filename: B_36_2009_13.pdf
Original checksum: c26779fafb98b28e1b096410a4f251c9
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Unexpected error in findFonts java.lang.ClassCastException: edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfSimpleObject cannot be cast to edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfDictionary offset=3186
Page count: 13
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date