Download the full-sized PDF of Analysis of linear and nonlinear genotype × environment interactionDownload the full-sized PDF



Permanent link (DOI):


Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley


This file is in the following communities:

Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Department of


This file is in the following collections:

Journal Articles (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)

Analysis of linear and nonlinear genotype × environment interaction Open Access


Author or creator
Yang, Rong-Cai
Additional contributors
Environmental Index
Genotype × Environment Interaction
Quantitative Trait Loci
Non-Linear Functions
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
The usual analysis of genotype × environment interaction (G × E) is based on the linear regression of genotypic performance on environmental changes (e.g., classic stability analysis). This linear model may often lead to lumping together of the non-linear responses to the whole range of environmental changes from suboptimal and super optimal conditions, thereby lowering the power of detecting G × E variation. On the other hand, the G × E is present when the magnitude of the genetic effect differs across the range of environmental conditions regardless of whether the response to environmental changes is linear or non-linear. The objectives of this study are: (i) explore the use of four commonly used non-linear functions (logistic, parabola, normal and Cauchy functions) for modeling non-linear genotypic responses to environmental changes and (ii) to investigate the difference in the magnitude of estimated genetic effects under different environmental conditions. The use of non-linear functions was illustrated through the analysis of one data set taken from barley cultivar trials in Alberta, Canada (Data A) and the examination of change in effect sizes is through the analysis another data set taken from the North America Barley Genome Mapping Project (Data B). The analysis of Data A showed that the Cauchy function captured an average of >40% of total G × E variation whereas the logistic function captured less G × E variation than the linear function. The analysis of Data B showed that genotypic responses were largely linear and that strong QTL × environment interaction existed as the positions, sizes and directions of QTL detected differed in poor vs. good environments. We conclude that (i) the non-linear functions should be considered when analyzing multi-environmental trials with a wide range of environmental variation and (ii) QTL × environment interaction can arise from the difference in effect sizes across environments.
Date created
License information

Attribution 4.0 International
Citation for previous publication
Yang, R. -C. (2014). Analysis of linear and nonlinear genotype × environment interaction. Frontiers in Genetics, 5(227), [7 pages].


Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1015034
Last modified: 2017:09:06 16:20:56-06:00
Filename: FG_5_227.pdf
Original checksum: b5921c191b8dc88d113798f833adcea3
Well formed: true
Valid: true
File title: Analysis of linear and non-linear genotype environment interaction
File title: Analysis of linear and non-linear genotype × environment interaction
File title: Analysis of linear and non-linear genotype environment interaction
File author: Rong-Cai Yang
Page count: 7
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date