ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Black Bear Density and Resource Partitioning with Grizzly BearsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3FJ29S82

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Black Bear Density and Resource Partitioning with Grizzly Bears Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
hunting
grizzly bear (Ursus arctos)
American black bear (Ursus americanus)
competition
population density
habitat
spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR)
resource partitioning
resource selection function (RSF)
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Loosen, Anne Elizabeth
Supervisor and department
Boyce, Mark S. (Department of Biological Sciences)
Examining committee member and department
Nielsen, Scott (Renewable Resources)
Derocher, Andrew (Department of Biological Sciences)
Mathot, Kim (Department of Biological Sciences) *Arms length examiner
Department
Department of Biological Sciences
Specialization
Ecology
Date accepted
2017-07-06T10:26:04Z
Graduation date
2017-11:Fall 2017
Degree
Master of Science
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
American black bears (Ursus americanus) and grizzly bears (U. arctos) have similar habitat requirements, relying on seasonally available grasses, forbs, fruiting shrubs and trees, and neonate ungulates. To avoid aggressive encounters with grizzly bears, black bears partition habitats spatially and temporally. For example, black bears avoid areas with high-quality resources like spawning salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) and ungulate carcasses when grizzly bears are present. We used non-invasive genetic sampling to identify unique individuals, sex, and species. We calculated resource-selection functions for each sex and species, contrasting bear ‘use’ locations with ‘available,’ to document seasonal habitat partitioning in southwestern Alberta, Canada. Using covariates from top RSF models, we made all pair-wise combinations of male and female black and grizzly bears (6 total) in a latent selection difference function. We collected bear hair during 7 sample occasions in early summer, late summer, and autumn in 2013 and 2014 in southwestern Alberta. From the top models, black bears avoided recently burned areas (<20 years old) relative to grizzly bears, grizzly bears selected public (Crown) lands, and black bears selected private lands. Western lands in our study area are primarily Crown land and eastern lands are primary private. For all seasons, male and female black bears showed the most overlap in resource selection. In early summer, female grizzly bears and female black bears showed the most overlap. In late summer, male and female black bears showed the most overlap. In autumn, male and female black bears, as well as male grizzly bears and female black bears showed higher overlap relative to other groups. Our results indicate habitat partitioning occurred in southwestern Alberta and clarify how grizzly bears, which are listed as a Threatened species in Alberta, are co-existing with a subordinate, but higher-density species. There has never been an empirical estimate of black bear density and abundance in southwestern Alberta. We used non-invasive genetic sampling and indices of habitat productivity and human disturbance to estimate black bear population density. We used spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) and resource-selection functions (RSF) to estimate density and abundance for each year and sex. SECR-derived black bear abundance estimates for males were 149.4 (95% CI: 124.6-179.2) in 2013 and 132.2 (95% CI: = 110.9-157.5) in 2014. SECR-derived abundance estimates for females were 261.4 (95% CI:199.9-341.8) in 2013 and 210.7 (95% CI: 159.3-278.6) in 2014. RSF-derived abundance estimates in the area of inference were 116.1 male black bears (95% CI: 82.3 – 163.9) in 2013 and 134.39 male black bears (95% CI: 98.9 – 182.6) in 2014 (Figure 6). For females in 2013, abundance in the area of inference was 159.5 (95% CI: 120.3 – 211.6) in 2013 and 147.54 (95% CI: 96.0 – 226.8) in 2014. Density estimates were highest on federally and provincially protected lands, followed by private land, and densities were lowest for both sexes on Crown land. With current plans to create two new Provincial Parks on Crown land in our study area, we speculate this could decrease mortality rates, and increase black bear densities on Crown land.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3FJ29S82
Rights
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2017-07-06T16:26:06.287+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/X)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 3283170
Last modified: 2017:11:08 16:27:35-07:00
Filename: Loosen_Anne_E_2017Jun_MSc.pdf
Original checksum: 5adc0b23ad520213685d28e2abfb39ca
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date