Download the full-sized PDF
Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3BC3T019
This file is in the following communities:
|Pediatrics, Department of|
This file is in the following collections:
|Immunology, Hematology, Oncology & Palliative Care (iHOPE)|
An examination of five spatial disease clustering methodologies for the identification of childhood cancer clusters in Alberta, Canada Open Access
- Author or creator
Rosychuk, Rhonda J.
- Additional contributors
spatial cluster detection
- Type of item
- Journal Article (Published)
Cluster detection is an important part of spatial epidemiology because it may help suggest potential factors associated with disease and thus, guide further investigation of the nature of diseases. Many different methods have been proposed to test for disease clusters. In this paper, we study five popular methods for detecting spatial clusters. These methods are Besag- Newell (BN), circular spatial scan statistic (CSS), flexible spatial scan statistic (FSS), Tango’s maximized excess events test (MEET), and Bayesian disease mapping (BYM). We study these five different methods by analyzing a data set of malignant cancer diagnoses in children in the province of Alberta, Canada during 1983-2004. Our results show that the potential clusters are located in the south-central part of the province. Although, all methods performed very well to detect clusters, the BN and MEET methods identified local as well as general clusters.
- Date created
- License information
- Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 Unported
- Citation for previous publication
Torabi M, Rosychuk RJ (2011). An Examination of Five Spatial Disease Clustering Methodologies for the Identification of Childhood Cancer Clusters in Alberta, Canada. Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology, 2(4), 321-330.
- Link to related item
- Date Uploaded
- Date Modified
- Audit Status
- Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 5041561
Last modified: 2016:06:24 18:06:15-06:00
Original checksum: a3ec6cc991bf1c63145b8671cb2fdd7f
Well formed: false
Status message: Invalid object number in cross-reference stream offset=5041526
File author: 103