ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Theoretical and Experimental Investigation on the Use of Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors for Evaluating the Adhesion of SU-8 Thin FilmsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R38K7579D

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Theoretical and Experimental Investigation on the Use of Surface Acoustic Wave Sensors for Evaluating the Adhesion of SU-8 Thin Films Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Adhesion
Surface Acoustic Waves
MEMS
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
EL Gowini, Mohamed MT
Supervisor and department
Moussa, Walied (Mechanical Engineering)
Examining committee member and department
Lou, Edmond (Electrical and Computer Engineering)
Moussa, Walied (Mechanical Engineering)
Duke, Kajsa (Mechanical Engineering)
Zuo, Ming (Mechanical Engineering)
Antar, Yahia (Royal Military College, Electrical and Computer Engineering)
Department
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Specialization

Date accepted
2015-09-30T09:57:02Z
Graduation date
2015-11
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Doctoral
Abstract
This research investigates the use of a SU-8/AlN/Si SAW sensor for evaluating the adhesion of SU-8 thin films. A theoretical model is developed to plot the wave dispersion profile for the SU-8/AlN/Si configuration. A spring interface model is utilized to represent the SU-8/AlN interface using a series of massless springs with stiffness K (N/m^3). The value of the interface spring stiffness K is changed to represent different levels of SU-8 adhesion. The wave dispersion profiles for the intermediate adhesion levels are plotted using the theoretical model. The change in wave velocity due to the change in adhesion of the SU-8 thin film is evaluated. The sensitivities of different configurations of the SU-8/AlN/Si SAW sensors are investigated. Four SAW sensor designs are selected to evaluate the adhesion of the SU-8 thin film. The four SAW sensors operate in the frequency range of 84-208MHz. A process flow for fabricating the SAW sensors at the University of Alberta micro-and nanofabrication facility “nanofab” is developed. The fabricated sensors are packaged using wire bonding to allow measurement of their frequency responses using a Vector Network Analyzer. For each of the four SAW sensor designs two sensor configurations will be developed. In one configuration the SU-8 film will be patterned on top of a thin gold film on the surface of the AlN/Si layers and in the second configuration the gold film will be coated with an Omnicoat layer prior to patterning the SU-8 film. Omnicoat is an adhesion promoter that is widely used to improve the adhesion of SU-8 to gold. The frequency responses from both sensor configurations are measured for each of the four SAW sensor designs and the frequency shift is evaluated. The frequency shift illustrates the change in adhesion of the SU-8 film with and without omnicoat. The phase velocity values also shift to a higher value for the sensor configurations without omnicoat. As the adhesion of the SU-8 film drops in the absence of omnicoat the stresses transferred to the SU-8 layer drop and accordingly the wave propagation is concentrated in the AlN/Si layers, which have a higher wave velocity than SU-8. However, in the presence of omnicoat the adhesion of the SU-8 layer improves and the surface acoustic wave propagates in the SU-8 layer, which leads to a drop in the phase velocity. The theoretical model is used to find the equivalent interface spring stiffness values for the two cases of SU-8 adhesion i.e. with and without omnicoat. This is accomplished by curve fitting the dispersion curves to the phase velocity values for from both sensor configurations. The equivalent interface spring stiffness values are found to be 8.0992 x10^9 N/m^3 and 7.9492x10^9 N/m3 for the SAW sensors with omnicoat and without omnicoat, respectively. These values indicate that when omnicoat is used as an adhesion promoter for SU-8 the interface spring stiffness increases due to the improved adhesion. However, without omnicoat the adhesion of the SU-8 layer drops, which corresponds to the lower interface spring stiffness value.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R38K7579D
Rights
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication
EL Gowini, M. M. and Moussa, W. A. “Evaluating the Adhesion of SU-8 Thin Films using an AlN/Si Surface Acoustic Wave Sensor”, Journal of Micromechanics & Microengineering, 2015; 25: 035031EL Gowini, M. M. and Moussa, W. A. “Theoretical and Experimental Investigation on the use of a Surface Acoustic Wave Sensor for SU-8 Thin Film Adhesion Characterization”, IEEE Sensors Journal, 2015, 15(8): 4667-4676

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2015-11-22T08:32:17.413+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 12542065
Last modified: 2016:08:04 15:25:01-06:00
Filename: Elgowini_Mohamed_MT_201509_PhD.pdf
Original checksum: 96828297cda8f3f5055c6f6d0880c40e
Well formed: true
Valid: false
Status message: Too many fonts to report; some fonts omitted. Total fonts = 1230
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=6144436
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=6144383
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=6144330
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=6144277
File title: Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION
File title: Mohamed Mahmoud Taher EL Gowini
File author: Mohamed Mahmoud El Gowini
Page count: 230
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date