ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Tools and Resources to Prevent Childhood Obesity in Primary CareDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3P55DN43

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Tools and Resources to Prevent Childhood Obesity in Primary Care Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Childhood Obesity
Digital Health
eHealth
Obesity
Pediatrics
Primary Care
Resources
Tools
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Avis, Jillian LS
Supervisor and department
Ball, Geoff (Pediatrics)
Examining committee member and department
Haqq, Andrea (Pediatrics)
Holt, Nicholas (Physical Education and Recreation)
Maximova, Katerina (School of Public Health)
Department
Medical Sciences-Paediatrics
Specialization

Date accepted
2016-09-26T16:38:13Z
Graduation date
2016-06:Fall 2016
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Doctoral
Abstract
Background. Tools and resources (TRs) can help to prevent obesity in children, particularly in settings that are accessible to families and well-aligned with chronic disease prevention, such as primary care. To date, little is known about the TRs that primary care providers (PCPs) currently use to prevent childhood obesity and how they can be evaluated, and if brief and novel eHealth (electronic Health) tools can be applied to help parents prevent childhood obesity when delivered in primary care. Objectives. To (i) pilot test a new method to evaluate TRs that PCPs currently use for preventing childhood obesity in primary care, and report a preliminary descriptive assessment of these TRs, and (ii) develop, refine, and pilot test a brief eHealth tool delivered in primary care to help parents prevent obesity in children. Methods. This doctoral thesis includes a mixed methods study (Study 1) and a multi-phased study (Study 2). The first study included individual semi-structured interviews with PCPs (Phase I) and evaluated currently used TRs across three assessment checklists (Phase II). Feedback was obtained from PCPs on our coding scheme and checklist data at follow-up (Phase III). The second study included the development of a parent-based digital screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) (Phase I), which was subsequently refined using focus groups with parents and stakeholders (Phase II). The modified version was pilot tested using a randomized controlled trial in primary care to assess feasibility and preliminary impact (Phase III). Results. For study 1, criteria on the checklists overlapped with PCPs’ perceptions of the suitability of TRs, but did not reflect the logistical factors that impacted their use. PCPs (n=19) reported using 15 TRs, most of which scored ‘adequate’ on the three checklists. For study 2, the SBIRT was developed by our research team and industry partners based on existing models and contemporary literature on children’s lifestyle behaviors. Refinements to the SBIRT were guided by feedback from five focus groups with health care professionals (n=20), parents (n=10), and researchers (n=8); participants viewed the SBIRT as a practical, well-designed eHealth tool, but suggested improvements to specific elements, such as weight-related terms that may elicit negative reactions from parents. Lastly, the SBIRT was pilot tested with parents (n=226) in primary care. The level of recruitment (n=226/268; 84.3%) and the proportion of parents who self-selected resources (n=194/226; 85.8%) within the SBIRT supported feasibility. At one-month follow-up, a greater proportion of parents with unhealthy weight children reported discussing weight with their pediatrician compared to those with healthy weight children (2=15.4; p<0.001). Conclusions. These studies provided a unique assessment and understanding of TRs that are used to prevent childhood obesity in primary care. The mixed methods evaluation of TRs demonstrated the usefulness of combining feedback from front-line providers with objective assessment data. Our preliminary assessment of TRs that PCPs currently use in Alberta demonstrated there is room for improvement, particularly with respect to readability levels and lack of content diversity beyond nutrition and physical activity. Based on feedback from focus group participants and pilot testing of our newly-developed eHealth tool, the SBIRT was feasible in primary care and may help to nudge parents towards accessing and using TRs that can have a positive impact on children’s lifestyle behaviors.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3P55DN43
Rights
This thesis is made available by the University of Alberta Libraries with permission of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private, scholarly or scientific research. This thesis, or any portion thereof, may not otherwise be copied or reproduced without the written consent of the copyright owner, except to the extent permitted by Canadian copyright law.
Citation for previous publication
Avis JL, Komarnicki A, Farmer AP, Holt NL, Perez A, Spence N, Ball GD. Tools and resources for preventing childhood obesity in primary care: a method of evaluation and preliminary assessment. Patient Educ Couns 2016;99:769-75.Avis JL, Holt NL, Maximova K, van Mierlo T, Fournier R, Padwal R, Cave AJ, Martz P, Ball GD. The development and refinement of an e-health screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for parents to prevent childhood obesity in primary care. Telemed J E Health 2016;22:385-94.Avis JL, Cave AJ, Donaldson S, Ellendt C, Holt NL, Jelinski S, Martz P, Maximova K, Padwal R, Wild TC, Ball GD. Working with parents to prevent childhood obesity: a protocol for a primary care-based eHealth study. JMIR Res Protoc 2015;4:e35.Avis JL, van Mierlo T, Fournier R, Ball GD. Lessons learned from using focus groups to refine digital interventions. JMIR Res Protoc 2015;4:e95.

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2016-09-26T22:38:14.661+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 4730704
Last modified: 2016:11:16 15:46:37-07:00
Filename: Avis_Jillian_LS_201609_PhD.pdf
Original checksum: 351d7b67086228626fa7369fbb656cc4
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date