Download the full-sized PDF
Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3FX74C2D
This file is in the following communities:
|ERA General Collection|
This file is not currently in any collections.
Suggestions for developing new institutional statements for DNA barcoding Open Access
- Author or creator
- Additional contributors
- Type of item
- Learning Object
The extent of actor heterogeneity is known to influence the outcomes in natural resource commons, and scholars have recently begun addressed the impact of heterogeneity on knowledge commons creation and sustainability. There is increasing evidence to challenge the dominant theory that heterogeneity is uniformly disadvantageous, but little is known about heterogeneity in knowledge commons.
This document summarizes recommendations based on my analysis of heterogeneity as it applies to rules for governing a knowledge commons - the DNA barcode commons. DNA barcodes are short, standardized gene regions that can be used to inexpensively identify unknown specimens, and proponents have led international efforts to make DNA barcodes a standard species identification tool. The dominant actors in the commons are researchers in diverse fields, and the global scope of barcoding means these researchers work in countries with varying levels of biodiversity, research infrastructure, and financial resources for scientific endeavours. This cultural and wealth heterogeneity among actors results in challenges for constructing and governing the commons, including its supporting infrastructure of databases and biorepositories. I interviewed participants in DNA barcoding, and collected organizational documents. I applied the grammar of institutions to identify institutional statements, and categorized each statement based on institutional logics theory. I found that institutional logics theory is an effective applied research tool to study heterogeneity in knowledge commons. My analysis also suggested that heterogeneity is a challenge to developing shared expectations in global knowledge commons, but participants can design institutional statements to bridge gaps in expectations.
- Date created
- License information
- Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
- Citation for previous publication
- Link to related item
- Date Uploaded
- Date Modified
- Audit Status
- Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (PDF/X)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 121420
Last modified: 2017:12:05 09:45:02-07:00
Original checksum: 11768df72b78742187b41a5e43d33bb9