ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Effect of Pipeline Construction on Soil Compaction in AlbertaDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3CN6Z320

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Alberta Centre for Reclamation and Restoration Ecology (ACRRE)

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

TransCanada Historical Research Reports

Effect of Pipeline Construction on Soil Compaction in Alberta Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Landsburg, S.
Cannon, K.R.
Finlayson, N.M.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
Pipeline
NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd.
NGTL Environmental Research Monographs 1995-2
Compaction
Soil
Penetrometer
Soil Strength
Right-of-Way
Gleysol
Type of item
Report
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
A study was initiated in 1988 to evaluate the effects of pipeline construction on soil compaction in the province of Alberta. The pipelines were located throughout Alberta on a number of different soils and were constructed using various techniques. Cone penetration resistance of soils (soil strength) was monitored to a depth of 31.5 cm at 14 study areas. Soil strength measurements were taken from right-of-way locations as well as from an adjacent undisturbed control. Soils were also analyzed to determine percent organic matter, moisture and clay. Soil strength information from the 14 study areas suggests that pipeline construction procedures can cause changes in soil strength on pipeline rights-of-way in Alberta. However, decreases in soil strength on the RoW compared to adjacent controls are more common than increases. These differences in soil strength appear to be short lived in the majority of cases; most differences, both increases and decreases, had disappeared one year after construction or were less than 2 bars. Although pipelines constructed through a number of different soils types were monitored, no clear relationships emerged between soil Orders, zones, or soil parent materials and the effect of pipeline construction on soil compaction. Soil moisture conditions appear to be more important. Pipelines constructed under moist to wet soil conditions were more likely to be compacted than if construction took place under dry soil conditions. Gleysolic soils for example were no more likely to be compacted during construction than soils of any other Order, provided construction took place under dry soil conditions.
Date created
1995
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3CN6Z320
License information
Rights
Permission for non-commercial use, publication or presentation of excerpts or figures is granted, provided appropriate attribution is cited. Commercial reproduction, in whole or in part, is not permitted without prior written consent. The use of these materials by the end user is done without any affiliation with or endorsement by TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. Reliance upon the end user's use of these materials is at the sole risk of the end user.
Citation for previous publication

Source
TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2016-03-16T12:52:46.468+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 3411900
Last modified: 2016:03:16 06:52:55-06:00
Filename: Landsburg Cannon and Finlayson - Effect of Pipeline Construction on Soil Compaction in Alberta.PDF
Original checksum: 39d53ec5f3e2d104c47de1a6219b1d99
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid object number in cross-reference stream offset=3411865
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date
User Chris Powter has updated Effect of Pipeline Construction on Soil Compaction in Alberta over 1 year ago