ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Evaluation of Radar and Cameras as Tools for Automating the Monitoring of Waterbirds at Industrial SitesDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3416T597

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Evaluation of Radar and Cameras as Tools for Automating the Monitoring of Waterbirds at Industrial Sites Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
Bird monitoring
Waterbirds
Radar
Camera
Ducks
Oil sands
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Loots, Sarina
Supervisor and department
St. Clair, Colleen Cassady (Department of Biological Sciences)
Examining committee member and department
Zhang, Hong (Department of Computer Science)
Bayne, Erin (Department of Biological Sciences)
Department
Department of Biological Sciences
Specialization
Ecology
Date accepted
2014-07-08T11:24:17Z
Graduation date
2014-11
Degree
Master of Science
Degree level
Master's
Abstract
Conflict occurs between people and birds at industrial sites around the world, where birds can endanger human lives (e.g. airports) and where bird populations are endangered by human activities (e.g. wind farms). Mitigating these conflicts requires accurate detection of birds and measures of their abundance and distribution. At industrial sites, detection of flying birds and the deployment of deterrents are often automated through detection by avian radar. Such sites include the various oil sands mining operations in northern Alberta, where operators are required to protect migrating waterfowl from landing on potentially toxic waste-water ponds. I tested two technologies for detecting birds in this context, one for flying birds (radar), and one for birds that have landed (cameras). I tested radar to establish its accuracy for detecting flying birds, based on birds detected by paired human observers. I used X-band marine radar and tested two types of radar antennas, one parabolic and one open-array, across a range of conditions at both process-affected water ponds and freshwater ponds. I found that the two antennas failed to detect about half of all detections confirmed by visual observers, both when they were each in operation separately (open-array antenna failed to detect 43% of targets that were confirmed as birds; parabolic antenna failed to detect 56.4% of targets that were confirmed as birds) and when they were in operation together (both antennas operating simultaneously on two radars failed to detect 43% of targets that were confirmed as birds by the visual observers). My results suggest that antenna type, height of radar station, substrate around the station, and site-specific knowledge of target birds should be more explicitly addressed when marine radar is used as part of bird protection programs. A combination of radar types, antennas, and other detection methods may be needed to achieve more comprehensive bird detection strategies at industrial sites. I also tested cameras to monitor birds in the context of industrial ponds. Birds that have landed on ponds are not detectable by radar, and standardised monitoring by human observers has documented tens of thousands of birds landing annually on oil sands process-affected water ponds. Such counts provide information on bird abundance, but there is considerable variation between observers and sites. To overcome these limitations, I evaluated the potential for cameras to monitor birds on industrial water bodies. I compared counts from high-resolution panoramic photos and photos taken by conventional remote cameras to counts conducted by field observers. I also tested the success of a computer algorithm to process photos automatically. High-resolution panoramas recorded two-thirds of bird counts recorded simultaneously by field observers, for distances of approximately 500 m from survey stations. Conventional remote cameras recorded two-thirds of birds in photos clearly, but only to a distance of 100 m. Both single-frame SLR panoramas and single-frame wildlife photos failed to capture birds that dove, birds that were behind other birds, and birds with oblique aspects to the camera. The presence of these birds could be revealed by capturing bird motion with multiple photo frames in short succession (time-interval). Automated processing of time-interval photos produced a very high true negative rate (95%), suggesting that it can substantially reduce the time spent by humans to process photos. The combined application of high resolution photos taken at frequent intervals and a specialized bird detection code makes cameras a viable alternative to human observers. Understanding the distributions and abundance of migratory waterfowl in the oil sands is in the interest of hunters, naturalists and citizens across North America. Radar and cameras can both contribute to this understanding, while simultaneously improving human safety, reducing cost and inter-observer variation, and increasing the duration and frequency of monitoring.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3416T597
Rights
Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2015-01-08T08:00:46.223+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 2455053
Last modified: 2015:10:12 21:02:00-06:00
Filename: Loots_Sarina_201407_MSc.pdf
Original checksum: 28732b06f90692b4101e1e017867ba2c
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date