ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Root foraging behaviour of plants: new theory, new methods and new ideasDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R30H5X

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Root foraging behaviour of plants: new theory, new methods and new ideas Open Access

Descriptions

Other title
Subject/Keyword
root foraging
foraging theory
plant behaviour
Type of item
Thesis
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
McNickle, Gordon Guy
Supervisor and department
Michael K Deyholos (Biological Sciences)
James F Cahill Jr (Biological Sciences)
Examining committee member and department
Edward W. Bork (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)
Jan O. Murie (Biological Sciences)
Susan A. Dudley (Department of Biology, McMaster University)
Department
Department of Biological Sciences
Specialization

Date accepted
2010-12-02T18:18:29Z
Graduation date
2011-06
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Doctoral
Abstract
All organisms, including plants, experience variability in the environment which puts pressure on organisms to evolve flexible responses. The study of these responses by organisms falls into the discipline of behavioural ecology. In this thesis, I am interested in the foraging behaviour of plant roots and I have two goals. First, I will use foraging theory from the animal literature to determine whether plants forage in ways that are similar to animals. Second, I will show how the adoption of foraging theory for plants can lead to a better theoretical understanding of coexistence of plants. I begin with a discussion of the major differences between plants and animals in their foraging behaviour and how this can be incorporated in to a more general predictive framework of plant foraging behaviour. I follow this discussion with two empirical tests of classic foraging models. First, I test a patch use model from the animal literature to determine if it can predict plant foraging behaviour. My results show that plants foraged for patches using the same strategies used by animals. Second, I test a resource choice model from the animal literature. These data indicated that plants select different types of nitrogen using the same resource choice strategies as foraging animals. These two studies reveal some basic foraging abilities of plants, however the experiments were performed in the absence of resource competition, a condition seldom experienced by plants in nature. To overcome difficulties in studying plant roots grown with neighbours I developed a molecular method for the identification of visually indistinguishable plant roots from competition experiments. Finally, I apply the molecular method to examine whether resource patchiness in soil can increase the intensity of competition experienced by foraging plants, and that the presence of neighbours influences the foraging strategies of plants. Together the results presented in this thesis show that plants use the same basic foraging strategies as animals, and that foraging behaviour can be linked to competition and coexistence of plant species.
Language
English
DOI
doi:10.7939/R30H5X
Rights
Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-05-01T02:46:06.393+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 935530
Last modified: 2015:10:12 16:50:12-06:00
Filename: McNickle_Gordon_Spring2011.pdf
Original checksum: 25c041f3d8d475bad36e46bebe25be5b
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid page tree node offset=342064
Status message: Unexpected error in findFonts java.lang.ClassCastException: edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfSimpleObject cannot be cast to edu.harvard.hul.ois.jhove.module.pdf.PdfDictionary offset=928644
Page count: 100
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date