Download the full-sized PDF
This file is in the following communities:
|Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research|
This file is not currently in any collections.
The Impact of Restrictive Drug Coverage Policies on Pharmacoepidemiologic Methods and Health Outcomes Open Access
- Other title
- Type of item
- Degree grantor
University of Alberta
- Author or creator
- Supervisor and department
Eurich, Dean T (Public Health Sciences)
- Examining committee member and department
Voaklander, Donald C (Public Health Sciences)
Gregoire, Jean-Pierre (Faculté de pharmacie)
McAlister, Finlay A (Medicine)
Johnson, Jeffrey A (Public Health Sciences)
School Public Health Sciences
- Date accepted
- Graduation date
Doctor of Philosophy
- Degree level
The unintended consequences of restrictive drug coverage policies on epidemiologic research methods and population health outcomes have been understudied. The primary objective of this program of research was to study the impact of these policies on the magnitude and direction of potential bias within administrative database studies. This was achieved through three related studies: 1) an observational study that estimated the magnitude of drug exposure misclassification in administrative data across seven therapeutic classes; 2) a simulation cohort study that quantified the potential degree of bias resulting from varying amounts of exposure misclassification to antidiabetic drugs introduced by restrictive drug coverage policies; and 3) a real-world cohort study that measured the effect of exposure misclassification introduced by capturing benefit drug use only on observed associations between exposure and outcome.
We demonstrated that incomplete drug exposure information for drugs with a restrictive coverage policy is more common than previously thought. In fact, we found that on average, drugs with a restrictive coverage had a 40% absolute lower capture rate within one of the most widely used and accepted drug administrative databases, compared to drugs without coverage restrictions. Although our simulation study suggested a large degree of bias might be introduced when drug exposure is differentially misclassified according to a drug policy, results from our cohort study with real-world data demonstrated that a clinically important degree of bias was not apparent, at least for our three study drugs.
In addition to impacting research methods, restrictive drug coverage policies themselves may have unintended clinical consequences at the population-level. Therefore, a second major initiative of the research program was to examine the population-level impact of removing a specific restrictive coverage policy. The fourth study demonstrated that removal of a prior authorization policy for thiazolidinediones significantly influenced drug utilization but did not adversely impact health outcomes.
The results from our program of research highlight the importance of giving serious consideration to the impact of restrictive drug coverage policies when designing, analyzing, and interpreting a pharmacoepidemiologic study. Further, we demonstrate the usefulness of rigorous evaluation for understanding the population-level consequences of the removal of a drug policy.
- Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
- Citation for previous publication
Gamble JM, McAlister FA, Johnson JA, Eurich DT. Quantifying the Impact of Drug Exposure Misclassification Due to Restrictive Drug Coverage in Administrative Databases: A Simulation Cohort Study. Value Health 2012;15:191-197.
- Date Uploaded
- Date Modified
- Audit Status
- Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1490215
Last modified: 2015:10:12 20:16:35-06:00
Filename: Gamble_John-Michael_Spring 2012.pdf
Original checksum: 7d2a7e1c3919a1904aad3543a0e3b0ef
Well formed: true
File title: Microsoft Word - Gamble PhD Thesis_Final.docx
File author: Spotlight
Page count: 107