ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of A note on quantifying “good” and “bad” prosodiesDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3J38KJ3J

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Linguistics, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Research Publications (Linguistics)

A note on quantifying “good” and “bad” prosodies Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Philip Dilt & John Newman
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
linguistics
english language
versification
adjectives (grammar)
polarity (linguistics)
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Semantic prosody, or discourse prosody as it is also known, has come to be a familiar dimension of corpus-based lexicology (see Louw 1993, Stubbs 1995, Sinclair 1991, Partington 2004 for examples), though it is not without its critics (cf. Whitsitt 2005). As Whitsitt demonstrates through his survey of the relevant literature, there are different emphases in the ways in which the term semantic prosody has come to be understood. The most common understanding that we seem to encounter, however, is that some words, or word groups, occur in contexts which are understood by the researcher to have ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ nuances, or prosodies (with KWIC displays of concordance lines facilitating the discovery of these prosodies). The prosodies are not simply to be equated with the nuances found at any one collocational position or with any one part of speech, but rather they emerge from miscellaneous lexical and phraseological phenomena in the context of usage of the word in question. In some interesting cases (e. g., the negative prosody associated with cause, as discussed in Stubbs 1995), the prosody is not particularly obvious, or even evident at all, to the researcher or native speaker prior to the corpus-based analysis.
Date created
2006
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3J38KJ3J
License information
Rights
© 2006 Philip Dilt & John Newman. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original authors and source must be cited.
Citation for previous publication
Dilts, P. & J. Newman. 2006. A note on quantifying “good” and “bad” prosodies. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 233-242.
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2015-07-14T20:59:22.816+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (PDF/A)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 514813
Last modified: 2015:10:12 17:53:43-06:00
Filename: CLLT_2_2_2006_233.pdf
Original checksum: 5246cea99545bb6c84ab63970057b10f
Well formed: true
Valid: true
File title: CLLT02U204
Page count: 10
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date