ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Understanding feedback report uptake: process evaluation findings from a 13-month feedback intervention in long-term care settingsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3XD0R02F

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Nursing, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Health Systems

Understanding feedback report uptake: process evaluation findings from a 13-month feedback intervention in long-term care settings Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Sales, Anne E.
Fraser, Kimberly
Baylon, Melba A.
O'Rourke, Hannah M.
Gao, Gloria
Bucknall, Tracy
Maisey, Suzanne
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
Feedback intervention
Long-term care
Quality improvement
Process evaluation
Type of item
Research Material
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Background Long-term care settings provide care to a large proportion of predominantly older, highly disabled adults across the United States and Canada. Managing and improving quality of care is challenging, in part because staffing is highly dependent on relatively non-professional health care aides and resources are limited. Feedback interventions in these settings are relatively rare, and there has been little published information about the process of feedback intervention. Our objectives were to describe the key components of uptake of the feedback reports, as well as other indicators of participant response to the intervention. Methods We conducted this project in nine long-term care units in four facilities in Edmonton, Canada. We used mixed methods, including observations during a 13-month feedback report intervention with nine post-feedback survey cycles, to conduct a process evaluation of a feedback report intervention in these units. We included all facility-based direct care providers (staff) in the feedback report distribution and survey administration. We conducted descriptive analyses of the data from observations and surveys, presenting this in tabular and graphic form. We constructed a short scale to measure uptake of the feedback reports. Our analysis evaluated feedback report uptake by provider type over the 13 months of the intervention. Results We received a total of 1,080 survey responses over the period of the intervention, which varied by type of provider, facility, and survey month. Total number of reports distributed ranged from 103 in cycle 12 to 229 in cycle 3, although the method of delivery varied widely across the period, from 12% to 65% delivered directly to individuals and 15% to 84% left for later distribution. The key elements of feedback uptake, including receiving, reading, understanding, discussing, and reporting a perception that the reports were useful, varied by survey cycle and provider type, as well as by facility. Uptake, as we measured it, was consistently high overall, but varied widely by provider type and time period. Conclusions We report detailed process data describing the aspects of uptake of a feedback report during an intensive, longitudinal feedback intervention in long-term care facilities. Uptake is a complex process for which we used multiple measures. We demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a complex longitudinal feedback intervention in relatively resource-poor long-term care facilities to a wider range of provider types than have been included in prior feedback interventions.
Date created
2015
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3XD0R02F
License information
Rights
© 2015 Sales et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Citation for previous publication
Sales, A.E., Fraser, K., Baylon, M.A.B, O'Rourke, H.M., Gao, G., Bucknall, T., & Maisey, S. 2015. Understanding feedback report uptake: process evaluation findings from a 13-month feedback intervention in long-term care settings. Implementation Science, 10(1), 20.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0208-2

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2015-05-12T16:48:33.774+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1351584
Last modified: 2015:10:12 14:22:00-06:00
Filename: IS_10_2015_20.pdf
Original checksum: 169dff2248f9e4a90d061ddad571d3f1
Copyright note: ??? 2015 Sales et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
Well formed: true
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=1098351
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=1098351
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=1098351
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=1098351
Status message: Invalid destination object offset=1098351
File title: Abstract
File title: Understanding feedback report uptake: process evaluation findings from a 13-month feedback intervention in long-term care settings
File author: Anne E Sales
Page count: 14
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date