Download the full-sized PDF
Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3HD7NT98
This file is in the following communities:
|Economics, Department of|
This file is in the following collections:
|Journal Articles (Economics)|
Complex concepts into basic concepts Open Access
- Author or creator
- Additional contributors
- Type of item
- Journal Article (Published)
Interdisciplinary communication, and thus the rate of progress in scholarly understanding, would be greatly enhanced if scholars had access to a universal classification of documents or ideas not grounded in particular disciplines or cultures. Such a classification is feasible if complex concepts can be understood as some combination of more basic concepts. There appear to be five main types of concept theory in the philosophical literature. Each provides some support for the idea of breaking complex into basic concepts that can be understood across disciplines or cultures, but each has detractors. None of these criticisms represents a substantive obstacle to breaking complex concepts into basic concepts within information science. Can we take the subject entries in existing universal but discipline-based classifications, and break these into a set of more basic concepts that can be applied across disciplinary classes? The author performs this sort of analysis for Dewey classes 300 to 339.9. This analysis will serve to identify the sort of 'basic concepts' that would lie at the heart of a truly universal classification. There are two key types of basic concept: the things we study (individuals, rocks, trees), and the relationships among these (talking, moving, paying).
- Date created
- License information
- © 2011 American Society for Information Science and Technology. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
- Citation for previous publication
Szostak, R. (2011). Complex Concepts into Basic Concepts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Techology, 62(11), 2247-2265. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21635.
- Link to related item
- Date Uploaded
- Date Modified
- Audit Status
- Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 216384
Last modified: 2015:10:12 14:36:43-06:00
Original checksum: 2624e4d35137531adb4f1275474cea68
Well formed: false
Status message: Invalid object number or object stream offset=2803
Status message: Invalid Annotation property offset=2803
Status message: Outlines contain recursive references.
File title: Complex Concepts into Basic Concepts