ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Sociology's Potential to Improve Forest Management and Inform Forest PolicyDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R33R0PV58

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Staff Papers (Resource Economics & Environmental Sociology)

Sociology's Potential to Improve Forest Management and Inform Forest Policy Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Beckley, Thomas M.
Korber, Dianne
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
forest sociology
forest management
forest policy
Type of item
Report
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
The social context within which forest managers operate today differs dramatically from that which existed fifty, thirty, or even ten years ago. Both government (public) and corporate (private) forest management decisions are coming under increased public scrutiny. A single, dominant forest management regime has existed in North America from the age of Fernow and Ponchot until today. That management regime is characterized by close relations between government regulators and industrial users/owners of forests, and an emphasis on industrial (fibre) uses of the vast majority of forest land. Over the last century that management regime has undergone evolutionary change without much interest or input from the general public. Times are changing rapidly. Environmental issues have increased in importance for the North American public in the last quarter century. However, it is only much more recently that the traditional paradigm of forest management has come under siege by a broad spectrum of stakeholder groups demanding greater input in forest management decision-making. The emerging forest management paradigm is focused on ecosystem health, the diverse human uses of forests, and long-term sustainability. Such a paradigm will necessarily need to draw on a wider base of scientific research to inform policy. This paper examines the potential of sociology to contribute to improved forest management within the new framework of integrated, ecosystem-based resource management. Sociology can provide forest managers and policy-makers with better information on the diversity of value orientations and interests of both \"new\" and traditional stakeholder groups. Sociologists study mechanisms of public involvement as well as instances when those mechanisms fail and overt social conflict over forest management emerges. Understanding why current management and policies work or fail from a social perspective, could help alleviate future policy stalemates and controversies over management. Finally, sociology may also provide a better understanding of the larger societal context of forestry and forest use. This may be done at the macro level through analyses of the impact of global restructuring in the forest sector, or at the micro level, through comparative case studies of forest-dependent communities. Such analyses could help policy-makers to better understand the social dynamics of local places where their decisions have the greatest impact. In this work, we will first review the past contributions of the social sciences (sociology in particular) to forest management. Several sociological methods that can help forest managers improve the quality of public involvement in forest planning and development will be reviewed. We also review literature on social movement and conflict and conflict resolution as they apply to forestry contexts. Further contributions to the general understanding of human interactions with forests will be examined. And finally, we will argue that Canada is particularly well situated to benefit from applied research in forest sociology.
Date created
1995
DOI
doi:10.7939/R33R0PV58
License information
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-05-01T02:19:22.535+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 91590
Last modified: 2015:10:12 17:21:29-06:00
Filename: sp-95-01.pdf
Original checksum: 81fb4a268741da1d2869331b6eff41a6
Well formed: true
Valid: true
File title: K:\TMB\SP-95-01.WP6
File author: Department of Rural Economy
Page count: 32
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date