ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Nursing home administrators’ perspectives on a study feedback report: A cross sectional survey.Download the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R33T9D87D

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Nursing, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Health Systems

Nursing home administrators’ perspectives on a study feedback report: A cross sectional survey. Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Bostrom, A. M.
Cranley, L. A
Hutchinson, A. M.
Cummings, G. G.
Norton, P. G.
Estabrooks, C. A.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
health informatics
health administration
health promotion
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
Background This project is part of the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) program of research, a multi-level and longitudinal research program being conducted in 36 nursing homes in three Canadian Prairie Provinces. The overall goal of TREC is to improve the quality of care for older persons living in nursing homes and the quality of work life for care providers. The purpose of this paper is to report on development and evaluation of facility annual reports (FARs) from facility administrators’ perspectives on the usefulness, meaningfulness, and understandability of selected data from the TREC survey. Methods A cross sectional survey design was used in this study. The feedback reports were developed in collaboration with participating facility administrators. FARs presented results in four contextual areas: workplace culture, feedback processes, job satisfaction, and staff burnout. Six weeks after FARs were mailed to each administrator, we conducted structured telephone interviews with administrators to elicit their evaluation of the FARs. Administrators were also asked if they had taken any actions as a result of the FAR. Descriptive and inferential statistics, as well as content analysis for open-ended questions, were used to summarize findings. Results Thirty-one facility administrators (representing thirty-two facilities) participated in the interviews. Six administrators had taken action and 18 were planning on taking action as a result of FARs. The majority found the four contextual areas addressed in FAR to be useful, meaningful, and understandable. They liked the comparisons made between data from years one and two and between their facility and other TREC study sites in their province. Twenty-two indicated that they would like to receive information on additional areas such as aggressive behaviours of residents and information sharing. Twenty-four administrators indicated that FARs contained enough information, while eight found FARs ‘too short’. Administrators who reported that the FAR contained enough information were more likely to take action within their facilities than administrators who reported that they needed more information. Conclusions Although the FAR was brief, the presentation of the four contextual areas was relevant to the majority of administrators and prompted them to plan or to take action within their facility.
Date created
2012
DOI
doi:10.7939/R33T9D87D
License information
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication
Bostrom, A. M., Cranley, L. A., Hutchinson, A. M., Cummings, G. G., Norton, P. G., Estabrooks, C. A. (2012). Nursing home administrators’ perspectives on a study feedback report: A cross sectional survey. Implementation Science, 7:88.
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-28T21:14:44.968+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 234357
Last modified: 2015:10:12 14:47:10-06:00
Filename: IS_2012_7.pdf
Original checksum: d8bd8de8b32f8fdeded5bf25d7c95808
Well formed: false
Valid: false
Status message: Invalid Resources Entry in document offset=5043
Status message: Invalid Resources Entry in document offset=5043
Status message: Invalid Annotation list offset=5043
Status message: Invalid outline dictionary item offset=213096
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date