Download the full-sized PDF of Application of genetic markers for evaluation of residual feed intake in beef cattleDownload the full-sized PDF



Permanent link (DOI):


Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley


This file is in the following communities:

Graduate Studies and Research, Faculty of


This file is in the following collections:

Theses and Dissertations

Application of genetic markers for evaluation of residual feed intake in beef cattle Open Access


Other title
Type of item
Degree grantor
University of Alberta
Author or creator
Mujibi, Fidalis
Supervisor and department
Crews, Denny (Animal Science)
Moore, Stephen (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)
Basarab, John (Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development)
Wang, Zhiquan (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)
Examining committee member and department
Basarab, John (Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development)
Lin, Guohui (Computing Science)
Moore, Stephen (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)
Dekkers, Jack (Animal Science)
Crews, Denny (Animal Science)
Wang, Zhiquan (Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science)
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science

Date accepted
Graduation date
Doctor of Philosophy
Degree level
Improving feed efficiency has become a top priority in beef cattle production because of the rapidly increasing cost of feed provision. However, because of the expense associated with collecting individual animal feed intake data, only a relatively small number of animals have been tested, leading to low accuracies of estimated breeding values (EBV). Three studies were conducted to demonstrate the usefulness of including DNA marker information in RFI genetic evaluations. In the first study, the effect of period of testing on RFI was assessed. Beef cattle steers were tested for feed intake, with different cohorts tested in the fall-winter and winter-spring seasons. Seasonal differences were detected although these were confounded by differences in age and weight among the seasons. Additionally, mean EBV accuracy obtained was low, ranging between 0.47 and 0.51, implying that strategies to increase this accuracy are necessary. In the 2nd study, a suite of genetic markers predictive of RFI, DMI and ADG were pre-selected using single marker regression analysis and the top 100 SNPs analyzed further in 5 replicates of the training data to provide prediction equations for RFI, DMI and ADG. Cumulative marker phenotypes (CMP) were used to predict trait phenotypes and accuracy of prediction ranged between 0.007 and 0.414. Given that this prediction accuracy was lower than the polygenic EBV accuracy, the CMP would need to be combined with EBV for effective marker assisted selection. In study 3, genomic selection (GS) theory and methodology were used to derive genomic breeding values (GEBV) for RFI, DMI and ADG. The accuracy of prediction obtained with GEBV was low, ranging from 0.223 to 0.479 for marker panel with 200 SNPs, and 0.114 to 0.246 for a marker panel with 37,959 SNPs, depending on the GS method used. The results from these studies demonstrate that the utility of genetic markers for genomic prediction of RFI in beef cattle may be possible, but will likely be more effective if a tool that combines GEBV with traditional BLUP EBV is used for selection.
License granted by Fidalis Mujibi ( on 2010-09-27T19:31:13Z (GMT): Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of the above terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis, and except as herein provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
Citation for previous publication

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 1551454
Last modified: 2015:10:12 15:33:25-06:00
Filename: Mujibi_Fidalis_Fall 2010.pdf
Original checksum: 2165177fc8b6e8c07f295f237d948c0e
Well formed: true
Valid: true
File title: ������������������������������������������������������������������������������
File title: Thesis_2010_Final_24Sept10
File author: ���������������������
File author: fmujibi
Page count: 293
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date