ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks--Supplementary materialsDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R38S4K273

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Psychology, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Journal Articles (Psychology)

Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks--Supplementary materials Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Du, Yu
McMillan, Neil
Madan, Christopher R.
Spetch, Marcia L.
Mou, Weimin
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
spatial memory
cue integration
cue conflict
landmark
Bayesian integration
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
We investigated how humans use multiple landmarks to locate a goal. Participants searched for a hidden goal location along a line between two distinct landmarks on a computer screen. On baseline trials, the location of the landmarks and goal varied, but the distance between each of the landmarks and the goal was held constant, with one landmark always closer to the goal. In Experiment 1, some baseline trials provided both landmarks, and some provided only one landmark. On probe trials, both landmarks were shifted apart relative to the previously-learned goal location. Participants searched between the locations specified by the two landmarks and their search locations were shifted more toward the nearer landmark, suggesting a weighted integration of the conflicting landmarks. Moreover, the observed variance in search responses when both cues were presented in their normal locations was reduced compared to the variance on tests with single landmarks. However, the variance reduction and the weightings of the landmarks did not always show Bayesian optimality. In Experiment 2, some participants were trained only with each of the single landmarks. On subsequent tests with the two cues in conflict, searching did not shift toward the nearer landmark and the variance of search responses of these single-cue trained participants was larger than their variance on single-landmark tests, and even larger than the variance predicted by using the two landmarks alternatively on different trials. Taken together, these results indicate that cue combination occurs only when the landmarks are presented together during the initial learning experience.
Date created

DOI
doi:10.7939/R38S4K273
License information
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International
Rights

Citation for previous publication

Source

Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2017-07-26T20:49:11.114+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 370615
Last modified: 2017:07:26 14:49:18-06:00
Filename: Du et al.(2016)cue integration--Supplementary Materials.pdf
Original checksum: 2af23a7dec1b3e1c5a345dc120e42db5
Well formed: true
Valid: true
File author: duyu
Page count: 7
File language: en-US
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date