ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Reliability and validity of the attitudes to ageing questionnaire for Canadian and Norwegian older adults.Download the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3RB2W

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Nursing, Faculty of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Chronicity

Reliability and validity of the attitudes to ageing questionnaire for Canadian and Norwegian older adults. Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Kalfoss, M.
Low, G.
Molzahn, A. E.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
validity
reliability
attitudes to ageing questionnaire
ageing
measurement
Type of item
Journal Article (Published)
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire (AAQ), a new scale designed for cross-cultural comparisons of older adults. There are currently very few measures intended to measure the attitudes of older adults to their own ageing. The instrument was designed as part of a larger study to develop a measure of quality of life (QOL) of older adults and to assess factors related to QOL; it was hypothesized that attitudes to ageing would be related to QOL. Canadian (n = 202) and Norwegian (n = 490) data were used. In both study samples, a series of correlation analyses indicated that item scores correlated most strongly with their parent subscales (r=0.42–0.79; p < 0.01). Acceptable internal consistency was shown (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.70 or greater for all subscales). In a confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), all 24 items in the AAQ were retained (p < 0.001); the observed lack of goodness of fit and residual covariance patterns provided empirical support, in part, for the construct validity of the AAQ. Patterns of correlations of the AAQ subscales with WHOQOL-OLD facets, WHOQOL-BREF domains, a global QoL item and GDS scores provided evidence of convergent and divergent validity. Nonsignificant correlations were found between psychological growth and two facets of the WHOQOL-OLD in the Canadian sample. Subscale scores also significantly discriminated between healthy and unhealthy groups. Further validation of the scale among older people, across countries, is recommended.
Date created
2010
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3RB2W
License information
Rights
© 2010 Wiley-Blackwell. This version of this article is open access and can be downloaded and shared. The original author(s) and source must be cited.
Citation for previous publication
Kalfoss, M. H., Low, G., & Molzahn, A. E. (2010). Reliability and validity of the attitudes to ageing questionnaire for canadian and norwegian older adults. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24(SUPPL. 1), 75-85.
Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-28T21:28:22.323+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 354041
Last modified: 2015:10:12 13:09:26-06:00
Filename: SJCS_2010_24.pdf
Original checksum: 7b587c6221b035f1ecd0f446431898cb
Well formed: true
Valid: true
File title: Quality of life in Polish respondents measured with WHOQOL-BREF
File author: M.P.
Page count: 38
File language: en-US
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date