ERA

Download the full-sized PDF of Implications of the Multilateral Trade Agreement for Canadian Agriculture: A Computable General Equilibrium EvaluationDownload the full-sized PDF

Analytics

Share

Permanent link (DOI): https://doi.org/10.7939/R3SX6495P

Download

Export to: EndNote  |  Zotero  |  Mendeley

Communities

This file is in the following communities:

Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, Department of

Collections

This file is in the following collections:

Staff Papers (Resource Economics & Environmental Sociology)

Implications of the Multilateral Trade Agreement for Canadian Agriculture: A Computable General Equilibrium Evaluation Open Access

Descriptions

Author or creator
Adilu, Shiferaw
Veeman, Michele M.
Veeman, Terry S.
Additional contributors
Subject/Keyword
international trade
equilibrium model
agricultural trade
Type of item
Report
Language
English
Place
Time
Description
This study evaluates the impacts of the Uruguay Round Agreement (URA) on Canadian agriculture in a single-country general equilibrium framework. For this purpose a computable general equilibrium model of the Canadian economy that involves six agricultural and two non-agricultural sectors was constructed and calibrated on 1991 data. To assess whether Canadian agriculture benefits from the URA, two sets of anticipated changes in world prices, taken from studies of the global effects of the URA, were introduced into the model exogenously. The simulation experiments show that the minimum increases in world prices from global studies are too small to offset the negative effects on agriculture of the reductions in level of global projections, Canadian agricultural producers gain from the URA. The sectors that benefit the most are wheat, other grains, and processed foods, for which production and exports increase appreciably. Imports of milk and poultry products increase substantially and livestock sector imports also increase. Labour and capital demand increase in agriculture, particularly in the wheat and other grain sectors. The highest increase in factor returns in agriculture is for agricultural land. Since the export prices applied above are exogenously determined, a third experiment is conducted to determine the extent of the world price changes for agricultural exports that would offset the negative effects on sectoral domestic production of the URA policy commitments. This would require world prices that are about eleven per cent higher than in the base period for wheat and about ten per cent higher for other grains. The greatest increase in prices--by nearly thirteen per cent--would be required for the milk and poultry sector. More modest changes in world prices for the other agricultural sectors are needed to offset the impacts of the reductions in sectoral support necessitated by the URA. Most of these price changes lie within the ranges of world price projections form studies of the global effects of the URA.
Date created
1998
DOI
doi:10.7939/R3SX6495P
License information
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 Unported
Rights

Citation for previous publication

Source
Link to related item

File Details

Date Uploaded
Date Modified
2014-04-29T16:16:57.251+00:00
Audit Status
Audits have not yet been run on this file.
Characterization
File format: pdf (Portable Document Format)
Mime type: application/pdf
File size: 96248
Last modified: 2015:10:12 20:48:24-06:00
Filename: sp-98-04.pdf
Original checksum: a7c764f4a77fb8afd0516d964492d4c6
Well formed: true
Valid: false
Status message: Improperly formed date offset=93222
File title: sp-98-04.PDF
File author: Unknown
Page count: 31
Activity of users you follow
User Activity Date